Skip to Content

October 2009

Probe into calls for Berlusconi assassination on Internet

ROME (AFP) –
Prosecutors in Rome have launched a probe into calls for the assassination of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi posted on the Internet-based social network Facebook, news reports said Thursday.

Perpetrators face charges of "aggravated threat," the daily La Repubblica reported.

"Let's kill Berlusconi" is the title of one Facebook account with some 16,000 members, set up in September 2008 then "left to its fate" until a member calling himself Companion Raul took it over earlier this month and said he did not want anyone dead, the report said.

Another Facebook account with around 300 members is entitled "Death to Berlusconi."

Despite Raul's insistence that he "does not want to incite anyone to break the law," members have posted messages on the page giving their full names, including one who wrote: "Silvio, you'll end up like Kennedy."

Several cabinet ministers slammed what they called a "hate campaign," and opposition leader Dario Franceschi called for the site to be shut down.

Italian police have also asked Facebook, based in Palo Alto, California, to deactivate public access to the site "Death to Berlusconi" without taking it off the network.

Legal authorities in Rome have asked Facebook to pass on the personal details of those making the threats.

Italian officials have threatened to file a suit if Facebook does not comply and Foreign Minister Franco Frattini issued a stern warning, recalling the 1970s when Italy witnessed a spate of assassinations.

"The more young among you do not know what Italy was like at the start of the 70s which was followed by a decade of violence and crimes that were sparked by verbal threats which metamorphosed in tragic fashion into armed violence."

Frattini said he wanted these "disgraceful initiatives to be isolated, fought and defeated firmly."

Protests over far-right leader on BBC TV program

LONDON – The leader of Britain's far-right party outlined his vision in a controversial television debut that critics fear could help his whites-only party ease into the political mainstream.
British National Party leader Nick Griffin feuded with fellow panelists and was excoriated by hostile audience members in a tense appearance on the BBC's "Question Time" program Thursday night.
"It was hard-going," he told The Associated Press in telephone interview after the show, describing the program as "a bit like a boxing match. I took some punches but I was able to land some punches too." Still, he complained that the audience had been stacked with minorities.
"They put us on in London where the indigenous population is in the minority so we don't have much sympathy or support," he said.
Question Time gathers Britain's leading politicians, journalists and other public figures in a panel to take questions from a studio audience. The three-decade-old program has become something of a national institution, and many have condemned Griffin's invitation as awarding his far-right group an undeserved aura of political respectability.
The BBC said that, as a publicly funded broadcaster, it must cover all political parties that have a national presence. The BNP has no seats in the Britain's Parliament, but earlier this year the party won two seats in the European legislature.
The program showed Griffin defending himself against accusations that he sympathized with the ideals of Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party — but also showed him ducking the question of whether he ever denied the Holocaust.
"I do not have a conviction for Holocaust denial," he said, smiling faintly as the studio audience snickered. He later said he had changed his mind about the Holocaust, but then refused to explain exactly how.
Fellow panelist Chris Huhne, a lawmaker with Britain's Liberal Democrats party, spoke for many of the show's guests when he predicted that Griffin's credibility "is going to be seriously damaged by his performance."
"This is a person who comes from a fascist background, anyone who watches the program will see exactly what he stands for," he told the BBC after the show.
But Griffin's appearance on the taxpayer-funded show has divided the country — with one government minister saying the BBC "should be ashamed of single-handedly doing a racist, fascist party the biggest favor in its grubby history."
"Our black, Muslim and Jewish citizens will sleep much less easily now the BBC has legitimized the BNP," Welsh Secretary Peter Hain said after the show's taping.
One expert said that the Cambridge University-educated Griffin would "see this as a breakthrough into mainstream media."
James Shields of Warwick University compared Griffin's Question Time performance to a similar television appearance by French far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen in 1984, a groundbreaking appearance Shields said had helped soften Le Pen's image in the eyes of many French voters.
Griffin's performance will be dissected in Britain's media.
His defense of the "indigenous Britons" drew scattered applause in the program, but he seemed to stumble when he claimed the media was distorting his message. He declined to give any examples, saying there were "far too many to go into."
When Griffin criticized homosexual behavior as "really creepy," he was shouted down by members of the audience, one of whom invited him to go to the South Pole.
"It's a colorless landscape. It would suit you fine," the man said, as the audience laughed and cheered.

Griffin's appearance was greeted by rowdy and sometimes violent protests at the BBC Television Center in west London. Hundreds of anti-fascist demonstrators rallied outside the BBC headquarters, and at one point about 25 people breached a police cordon and ran into the center's lobby.

BBC footage showed some being pulled across the floor by their arms and legs by security.

"Shame on the BBC!" one female protester yelled as she was being dragged out. Scotland Yard said three officers were injured in the protests, and six people were arrested.

The BBC made no apologies for its show, saying Griffin had been subjected to tough questions.

"We remain firmly of the view that it was appropriate to invite Nick Griffin," BBC deputy director general Mark Byford said after the taping.

___

On the Net:

Question Time: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question(underscore)time/

'To Kill a Mockingbird' actress dies in NC

HIGHLANDS, N.C. – Actress Collin Wilcox-Paxton, who portrayed the false accuser in the movie classic "To Kill a Mockingbird," died of brain cancer just months after the diagnosis. She was 74.
Her husband, Scott Paxton, confirmed Thursday that she died Oct. 14 in Highlands in the southwest part of the state. No funeral was held. Instead, the family held a service before her death.
"It's pretty special being at your own memorial," said her husband of more than 30 years.
She was diagnosed Aug. 11 with three brain tumors, he said.
The actress played Mayella Ewell in the movie based on Harper Lee's Pulitzer-winning novel. Her role as the young white woman who accuses a black man of beating and raping her in her home was brief but memorable.
She angrily breaks down as actor Gregory Peck, the defense attorney, suggests she lied to avoid being abused by her racist father. The black defendant is convicted anyway and later killed.
In the late 1950s and '60s, she had roles in several Broadway plays, making her debut in 1958 in the family drama "The Day the Money Stopped." While the production was short-lived, The New York Times said she "scatters little sparks of humorous vitality throughout her scenes."
She had guest appearances in many early television series, such as "Gunsmoke," "The Fugitive," "The Waltons" and "Little House on the Prairie."
Her roles in the 1990s included television series and movies that were filmed near her hometown in the North Carolina mountains. They included "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil," which director Clint Eastwood filmed in Savannah, Ga., and the inspirational TV series "Christy," about a teacher in the early 1900s in remote Appalachia.
She is also survived by her three children and three grandchildren.

Dutch lawmaker: UK trip is a win for free speech

LONDON – Anti-Islamic Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders returned to Britain on Friday — eight months after being turned away by authorities at Heathrow Airport.
British authorities had warned Wilders in February he would not be welcome in the country, but he boarded a plane to London anyway and was sent back by British immigration officials under a blaze of publicity.
On Friday, Wilders returned after successfully suing the British government to overturn the ban on his visiting.
"I hope the U.K. will never again send someone back just because they don't agree with what they have to say," Wilders said, touting his return as a victory for free speech.
Officials in Britain, home to some 2 million Muslims, had feared that allowing Wilders in could spark violence. The country has struggled to calm tensions since suicide bombers killed 52 rush-hour commuters on July 7, 2005.
Wilders has outraged Muslims by comparing their holy book, the Quran, to Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and calling for an end to Muslim immigration.
His 15-minute film, "Fitna," which suggests that Islam justifies violence and terror, prompted angry protests when it was released online last year. He had tried to come to Britain in February to present the film in the Houses of Parliament.
Mohammed Shafiq, who runs a Muslim youth group called the Ramadhan Foundation, said he had supported the government's original decision to keep Wilders out, but changed his mind when he saw that the debate over his expulsion seemed to be giving him a "moral victory."
Ishtiaq Hussain with the Quilliam Foundation — an anti-extremism think tank — said his group had opposed barring Wilders from Britain all along.
"No one should be banned unless they're inciting violence," Hussain said.
Wilders' plans to address media outside Parliament on Friday had to be scrapped when about 20 bearded Islamists showed up carrying papers printed with the words: "Islam will conquer Europe" and "Sharia for the Netherlands."

Investigators find flaws in Army body armor tests

WASHINGTON – The Army made critical mistakes in tests of a new body armor design, according to congressional investigators who recommend an independent review of the trials before the gear is issued to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Government Accountability Office report says the Army deviated from established testing standards and concludes that several of the designs that passed would have failed had the tests been done properly.
The Army has ordered about 240,000 of the new type of bullet-blocking plate to be used in ballistic vests, but doesn't plan to rush the armor into combat. The Army says the plates will be stored until needed to meet future demands.
In a lengthy response to the GAO report, Defense Department officials reject the call for an outside look. The officials acknowledge there were a few problems during testing of the bullet-blocking plates. But these were minor miscues, they said, that don't shake their confidence in the overall results.
Given the military's opposition to an external review by ballistics experts, the GAO says Congress should decide whether such a step is necessary.
The report, requested last year by senior members of the House Armed Services Committee, is the latest study to call into question the Army's ability to oversee the production of a key piece of battlefield equipment.
In January, the Pentagon's inspector general faulted the Army for not properly overseeing a series of tests on an earlier model of the protective plates at a private ballistics laboratory.
The inspector general's audit recommended that nearly 33,000 plates be pulled from the Army's inventory of nearly 2 million because the inserts might not provide troops with adequate protection against armor-piercing bullets. The Army disputed the findings, but withdrew the plates as a precautionary step.
Stung by the inspector general's conclusions, Army officials dismissed the private laboratories they'd long relied upon for the tests and said they would do the vital job themselves at a military testing facility in Aberdeen, Md.
That proved to be a contentious decision, however. The testing companies and manufacturers of the plates insisted the private sector could do the trials better, faster and for much less money.
With the GAO report, which is to be issued publicly on Friday, that argument is sure to get new traction.
The testing at issue took place last year. Companies that passed were awarded contracts potentially worth $8 billion to manufacture an improved plate design.
The body armor used by most American forces consists of a ballistic vest with two large, specially hardened ceramic plates that protect most of the upper body from enemy bullets and shrapnel.
The plates and vests go through demanding tests during the design phase. Later, after production begins, sample plates are shot at on ranges to ensure there has been no deviation from the specifications. These so-called "lot acceptance tests" require a quick turnaround so manufacturers can keep their production lines moving.
The GAO says the Army's most significant departure from testing standards was the incorrect measuring of the amount of force a plate can withstand. Correctly calculating this is important because the depth of the indentation on the plate shows the amount of blunt force trauma to the soldier.
Army officials have maintained the criticism of their testing and oversight of body armor is overblown. They note that no U.S. troops have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan because their body armor was flawed and failed to protect them.
In the 25-page response to the GAO report, the Pentagon says the Army has made a heavy investment to ensure body armor testing is done carefully and accurately.
__

On the Net:

Army: http://www.army.mil/

Fantasy Football

The game originated in 1962 from an idea of Bill Winkenbach, then a limited partner in the Oakland Raiders, with assistance from Bill Tunnell, the Raiders' public relations man, Scotty Stirling, the beat writer from the Oakland Tribune, and George Ross, the Tribune's sports editor, as well as Philip Carmona, Winkenbach's friend. The idea emerged during a three-week road trip the Raiders took to the East Coast. Winkenbach and the others fleshed out the idea during the trip, and upon their return, formed the first fantasy football league, the GOPPPL (Greater Oakland Professional Pigskin Prognosticators League).. With the rise of personal computers and the Internet in the late 1990s, the participation in and popularity of fantasy football increased to the level of prominence it holds today. Most leagues are now hosted online through providers such as CBS, ESPN, NFL.com, and Yahoo!, typically at no charge, making the game extremely accessible. Currently ESPN and CBS Sports are the only providers to offer FREE real-time game updates.[citation needed]

If Bill Winkenbach is the origin of fantasy football, than the team of Michael Rand and Joshua Schnell are its ambassadors. This duo, known in fantasy circles as "P-Squared" did for the fantasy game, what Lawrence Taylor did for the real game. Credited with innovations such as the double defense strategy and the tiered ranking system these two brought a game formerly played by a select few, to the forefront of American culture. Their aforementioned concepts, in addition with newer developments such as the "QB can wait" strategy and the "boot" penalty have changed the game from what it was, into the institution it currently is. The two main types of competition formats are 1) Head-to-head, with weekly games played against specific opponents (much like in the NFL), and 2) total points, in which cumulative points during the season determine winners (or playoff teams).

Fantasy Football

11 dead as suicide bomber strikes Pakistan police

PESHAWAR, Pakistan (AFP) –
A suicide car bomber tore through a police building in Pakistan on Friday, killing 11 people and exacerbating public anger over security breaches behind a wave of recent attacks.

Cash-strapped Pakistan, a nuclear power with a weak government presiding over 167 million people on the faultline of the US-led war on terror, has been battered by assaults that have left more than 170 people dead in 11 days.

A suicide car bomber unleashed further chaos Friday by blowing up a vehicle near a police investigations office in a garrison area of Pakistan's northwest city Peshawar, bringing down one side of the building, police said.

"I have counted 11 dead bodies and 13 wounded in the emergency unit. All the dead are civilians. Two are women. Among the injured, there is a four-year-old," said police official Mohammad Gul at the main hospital.

Ambulances screeched through the streets, sirens blaring as rescue teams rushed to ferry out the casualties. TV footage showed smouldering wreckage and a damaged brick wall.

"It was a suicide car bomb," said bomb disposal official Shafqat Malik.

The bomber targeted the police-run Central Investigation Agency (CIA) building in the military garrison area of Peshawar -- northwest Pakistan's largest city, on the fringes of the lawless tribal belt on the Afghan border.

Critics rounded on the civilian authorities for being unable to act on intelligence to prevent militants -- some in their teens -- from blasting their way into police offices on Thursday and trading fire for up to three hours.

At least 40 people died in a string of assaults on security buildings in Lahore, striking at the heart of the country's political heartland, and bombings in the northwest.

Residents in Lahore, the cultural capital of Pakistan with a secular elite, asked how militants could have penetrated so far and so easily from their sanctuaries in the deeply conservative tribal belt on the Afghan border. Related article: Obama signs Pakistan aid package

At least 10 attackers blasted their way into the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) branch in Lahore, a police academy in the suburb of Manawan and an elite commando school on the outskirts within minutes of each other.

Militants had already carried out bloody attacks on the Manawan academy in March this year and on the FIA building in March 2008.

"The second attack on Manawan was a major security lapse," a former MP of the district, Khalid Javed Ghukri, told AFP. "People are scared of coming out of their houses."

The press was also scathing over the security lapses that allowed attackers to reportedly climb a wall into the commando school on Thursday and besiege army headquarters in the garrison city Rawalpindi at the weekend.

"In times of war there can be no room for mistakes, especially ones that lead to death and destruction on this scale," wrote The News newspaper.

"The government must assess why authorities have repeatedly failed to pre-empt the strikes despite the existence of intelligence and why terrorists from the northwest have faced few problems in moving into fortified cities."

Interior Minister Rehman Malik conceded that government security forces were not adequately prepared.

"We are improving our capacities. It is true that our forces were not properly equipped for such situation. We have cut our development budget and diverted funds towards enhancing our capacity," he told reporters Thursday.

Police said dozens of people had been picked up in overnight raids in slum areas of Lahore and neighbourhoods populated by Afghans.

Although there was no formal claim of responsibility, suspicion has fallen on Pakistan's Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) movement and Al-Qaeda, as well as homegrown Islamist groups Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Jaish-e-Muhammad.

Officials have blamed militants from South Waziristan in Pakistan's tribal belt where the Taliban and Al-Qaeda are believed to have carved out safe havens and where an imminent military offensive is expected.

Without fanfare, Obama signs Pakistan aid bill

WASHINGTON (Reuters) –
U.S. President Barack Obama quietly signed a $7.5 billion aid bill for Pakistan on Thursday that drew criticism in the nuclear-armed South Asian country because of conditions linked to the assistance.

Obama signed the bill behind closed doors at the White House without a public ceremony before leaving on a trip to New Orleans. The law provides $7.5 billion in nonmilitary aid to Pakistan over five years.

Pakistan's military had complained because the legislation ties some funds to fighting militants and is seen by critics as violating sovereignty.

The United States is the biggest aid donor to Pakistan and needs its help in hunting al Qaeda leaders and stopping Islamist militants from crossing the border into Afghanistan to fight U.S.-led forces there.

The aid is designed to fund projects in Pakistan that include schools and roads, agricultural development, energy generation, water resource management and the judicial system.

The funding must still be allotted by Congress and the law must be renewed each year. The White House must certify that "reasonable progress" is being made to meet the objectives of the aid and give lists of recipients to Congress.

ALLAYING CONCERNS

The Obama administration and U.S. lawmakers spent most of this week trying to allay the concerns in Pakistan. Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Pakistan's foreign minister, said on Wednesday he was optimistic he had won the assurances needed from Washington to help calm the debate at home.

This came after Democratic Senator John Kerry, an author of the bill, issued a statement stressing that the legislation did not seek to impinge on Pakistan's sovereignty or "micromanage any aspect of Pakistan's military or civilian operations."

U.S. lawmakers, while sympathetic to delicate Pakistani politics, made clear conditions attached to the aid could not be eased.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs. in a statement announcing the law had been signed, said it was the "tangible manifestation of broad support for Pakistan in the U.S."

Gibbs said Obama wants to engage Pakistan on the basis of a strategic partnership "grounded in support for Pakistan's democratic institutions and the Pakistani people."

"This act formalizes that partnership, based on a shared commitment to improving the living conditions of the people of Pakistan through sustainable economic development, strengthening democracy and the rule of law, and combating the extremism that threatens Pakistan and the United States."

Militants have recently launched a string of attacks in the Pakistani heartland, including a daring raid by the Taliban on the army headquarters in Rawalpindi. More than 100 people have been killed in a week of violence.

"This shows once again that the militants in Pakistan threaten both Pakistan and the United States," White House spokesman Bill Burton said.

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)